The first letters of successive lines can appear to form a word. That observation becomes more interesting when you ask whether the line divisions belong to the source or to a modern editor’s page layout.
For a harmless invented exercise, write four lines beginning with R, E, A, and D. The result is deliberate because you constructed it. Finding those letters in someone else’s text requires more evidence before claiming deliberate design.
Preserve the boundaries
Record the letters, the exact units you selected, and the source of their divisions. Did you use verse lines, sentences, paragraphs, or whatever happened to fit on the printed page? Changing the unit after seeing the result can manufacture a pattern.
Check whether another edition divides the passage differently. A translation may also begin its lines with entirely different letters, so a pattern in translation is not automatically evidence about the original language.
Keep failed attempts in your working notes. Selecting only the pleasing sequence hides how many alternative routes you tested.
This approach does not rule out intentional patterns. It makes the claim inspectable: another reader can repeat the same selection and see where interpretation begins. A visible sequence is the starting evidence, while authorship and intention remain questions to investigate.
Editorial illustration from this site’s image library; not documentary evidence of the example or object discussed.